The Cunning Mediator
The Cunning Mediator: Beware of a rascal who pretends to be holy.” Two partridges (quail-like birds) lived in a certain tree in the jungle. While one of them
“Beware of a rascal who pretends to be holy.”
Two partridges (quail-like birds) lived in a certain tree in the jungle. While one of them lived on the branches, the other lived inside a hole at the foot of the tree.
They became good friends, and they would spend long hours with each other telling each other stories and events of their lives. In this manner, the partridges spent their time in happiness.
One day, one of them went away with some more partidges in search of food.
As was usual, when he did not return back even at sunset, the other partridge started worrying. He thought, “He has not done this ever. Why has the partridge not returned home today? Has been trapped by some hunter? Or maybe even killed? I cannot live without him. I am certain there is some reason why he has not returned even at nightfall.”
He did not return even the next day, or the day after. For several days, the partridge kept worrying, and then gave up hope of his friend’s return. “And so, I spent several days worrying.
On nightfall, a hare came to the tree and observing an empty hole at the foot of the tree, took shelter inside. Since, the partridge had given up hope, he did not object to the hole being occupied by the hare.
After a few days the partridge returned. He had gone to a place where there was plenty of food to eat. He had grown fat, but remembering his dear friend, he thought of returning.
On his return, when he found that a hare had taken over his house, he objected strongly, “Hare! This hole is my home, and you have taken over during my absence. This is very unfair of you. I demand you to leave immediately”.
The hare disagreed, “This place is mine now. I am not leaving. I found this hole empty, and therefore made it my home”. Thus, they began to quarrel.
The partridge understood there was no point in quarrelling with the hare, and said, “Hare! You seem to lack the basic ethics. Let us approach someone holy and knowledgeable. Let someone well-versed in holy books decide who is right, and thus, who shall have the right to occupy the hole.”
The hare agreed, and as suggested they went to look for a holy man to settle their dis pute.
Meanwhile, a wild tomcat became aware that they wanted to settle their dis pute through a holy man. He quickly posed as a learned animal. He held a blade of holy Kusha grass in his paw and stood on the bank of a river, where he will be quickly spotted.
Standing on his hind legs, with his eyes closed, he started chanting.
When the partridge and the hare came across him, the hare said, “He looks holy, and a learned person. Let us go and seek his advice.”
The partridge agreed but said, “Yes, let us seek his opinion. But he is a wild cat by birth, and a natural enemy for both of us. We should be careful, and speak only from a distance.”
As decided, they came to the wild tomcat, but stood at a distance, “Holy person! We have a dis pute amongst us. Will you please settle our dis pute and advice us who is right in accordance to Holy Scriptures. If you decide that one of us has sinned, you may as well eat him!”
The tomcat replied, “Omy friends, I have denounced the violent life as it leads to hell. Non-violence is the very essence of true religion. I shall not harm any of you. However, I will hear both of you and settle your dis pute with the knowledge I have gained.”
Both the partridge and the hare were impressed. The wild tomcat continued, “But I am old, and cannot hear you from that distance. Fear not! I do not even harm a lice, bug or a mosquito. Come close, and explain the reason of your dis pute. I shall make the most just settlement.”
With all these sayings, he won the confidence of both of them. Both the partridge and the hare came near him and sat close to him to explain the reason of their dis pute.
This was the very opportunity that the tomcat was looking for. As soon as they sat beside him, he jumped and seized one of them in his teeth and the other with his claws. He killed both of them and made a meal out of them.
Moral
The wise indeed say: Beware of a rascal who pretends to be holy.
Book 3: Story 31
Historical & Cultural Context
The Panchatantra (Sanskrit: Pañcatantra, “five treatises”) is an ancient Indian collection of interlinked animal fables traditionally attributed to Vishnu Sharma in roughly the 3rd century BCE. Composed to teach three reckless princes the arts of governance (niti-shastra), its stories were carried by merchants and translators across Persia, Arabia and Europe, seeding the world’s fable tradition.
This tale belongs to Mitra-bheda (Separation of Friends), exploring how deceit disrupts relationships. The motif of the false mediator appears in nitishastra texts emphasizing that justice requires impartiality. Vishnu Sharma’s frame narrative places such stories as lessons for princes learning to recognize treachery. The tale aligns with broader ancient wisdom literature warning against those who profit from others’ conflicts. Similar themes appear in Sanskrit works dating 200 BCE onward, where the value of honest arbitration is paramount.
Reflection & Discussion
- What made the mediator think his trick would work without being discovered eventually?
- Have you seen someone try to be a mediator but secretly take sides? What happened?
- If both parties had trusted the mediator completely, would his plan have worked forever?
Did You Know?
- The Panchatantra was written around 200 BCE by Vishnu Sharma to educate three young princes.
- The Panchatantra has been translated into over 50 languages, making it one of the most translated works in history.
- Many of Aesop’s Fables are believed to have roots in the Panchatantra stories.
What This Tale Teaches Us Today
Old stories keep their power because their lessons never stop being useful. Here is how this one still applies:
- Shared stories are one of the strongest bonds within any community – families, cultures, or whole nations.
- Stories that have survived for centuries have done so because their lessons still work.
- Folk tales teach ethics without lecturing. A good story can reshape a mind more powerfully than any rule.
Why This Story Still Matters
The Cunning Mediator joins a vast global library of folk tales that human beings have been telling one another for thousands of years. Every culture has produced its own stories, but the deepest themes – courage, kindness, cleverness, loyalty, the cost of greed – appear again and again in different clothes. Modern readers who spend time with folk tales inherit something precious: a sense that people have always wrestled with the same basic questions, and that good stories can still help us find good answers. That is why these tales persist. Each one is a small tool for living, handed down quietly through generations.
Cultural Context and Continuing Influence
Folk tales like this one survived for hundreds of years through oral storytelling before any scholar thought to write them down. Grandparents told them to grandchildren, travelers traded them along roads and rivers, and mothers repeated them to babies who would one day repeat them to their own children. Each small retelling sharpened the story, discarded unnecessary parts, and polished the essential lesson. That long process of refinement is why a good folk tale feels so weighty – it has been shaped by thousands of listeners across generations, each contributing something small to the story we read today.
Modern readers sometimes wonder whether folk tales are still relevant in an age of apps and smartphones. The answer is yes, perhaps more than ever. The technology changes, but the underlying questions – about kindness, courage, loyalty, greed, family, fear, love – do not. These are the same questions that children asked around a fire in ancient India, around a hearth in medieval Ireland, around a campfire in 19th-century Korea. And they are the same questions children ask their parents today, just phrased differently. That is why a family that reads folk tales together is doing real cultural and emotional work, not simply entertaining itself.
Reading Folk Tales With Children
Reading folk tales aloud to children is one of the oldest and most effective forms of moral education. Unlike a lecture or a rule, a story slides past a child’s natural resistance and plants its lesson in the imagination, where it quietly grows. Years later, when the child meets a real situation that resembles the story – a bully at school, a dishonest coworker, a moment of temptation – the old tale rises to the surface of memory and offers guidance. That is why parents and teachers across every culture have trusted stories to do the work of raising good humans, long before formal schools or textbooks existed.
When reading this story with a young listener, try pausing at key moments and asking what the child thinks will happen next. Let them guess, even if they are wrong. That small act of prediction turns a passive listener into an active thinker. After the story ends, a simple open question – “What would you have done?” or “Who do you think was the smartest character?” – invites the child to connect the tale to their own life. Those conversations are where real learning happens, not during the reading itself but in the quiet moments that follow.
Older children and teenagers sometimes think they have outgrown folk tales. In reality, the best tales only deepen with age. A ten-year-old hears the surface plot; a fifteen-year-old notices the irony; a twenty-year-old sees the economic and political pressures on the characters; a forty-year-old understands the parents in the story for the first time. A good folk tale is a gift that keeps unfolding for decades. Families who read and reread the same stories across the years discover this naturally, and pass the discovery down.