The Fortunes Of Yoo

What the Yoo Family Knew About Good Luck

There is a story, well-known across the Chinese and Korean classical traditions, of an old man at the frontier whose horse ran away. His neighbours came to console him on his misfortune. He said: perhaps. Some time later the horse returned, bringing a fine wild horse with it. The neighbours came to congratulate him. He said: perhaps. His son, riding the wild horse, fell and broke his leg. The neighbours came to console him. He said: perhaps. Then military conscription came through the district, and his son’s broken leg exempted him from service, while the healthy young men of the village marched away to a war that killed most of them. The neighbours came to congratulate him. He said: perhaps.

This story — called saeong-jima (새옹지마) in Korean, the old man at the border losing his horse — encodes one of the most durable principles of Korean and Chinese folk philosophy: that the relationship between apparent fortune and actual outcome is not predictable in advance, that what looks like good luck may generate bad consequences and what looks like bad luck may generate good ones, and that the wise response to either is the same equanimity the old man maintained throughout. The Yoo family’s story is this principle extended across three generations of a single household, each turn of fortune preparing the ground for the next in ways no individual member of the family could have seen at the time they were living through it.

Beat I — The Yoo Family’s Rise and What It Cost

The Yoo household had been moderately prosperous for two generations when the story begins — prosperous enough to be comfortable, not so prosperous as to have attracted the attention that significant wealth in Joseon could attract. The grandfather had been a frugal man with a talent for the small-scale trade that connected market towns, and he had built a reliable business over forty years of careful work. His son, inheriting both the business and the grandfather’s reputation for reliability, expanded it. By the time the grandson came of age, the Yoo household was one of the more substantial merchant families in its district.

The prosperity brought opportunities the grandfather would not have had access to: educational possibilities for the grandson, social connections with families of higher status, the possibility of examination success and official career. The grandson was genuinely talented; he studied hard and performed well. The family invested significantly in his preparation. He passed the examinations. He received an official appointment. The neighbours came to congratulate the Yoo family on their good fortune.

The grandfather, now very old, said: perhaps. He had lived long enough to know that official positions in Joseon came with risks as well as opportunities — that the same connections that produced appointment could produce vulnerability, that the same visibility that came with success made one a target when political winds shifted. He was not pessimistic; he was a man who had learned, across a long life, to hold good fortune with the same looseness he held bad fortune. The family listened to his caution with the respectful inattention that the young typically extend to the very old.

Beat II — The Fall and the Reversal Within It

The political winds shifted, as they periodically did in Joseon. The official faction that had supported the grandson’s patron fell from favour; the patron himself was demoted and exiled. The grandson, associated with the now-disgraced network, was removed from his position. The family’s capital, which had been invested in the social infrastructure of the official career — the gifts, the reciprocal obligations, the maintenance of relationships that official life required — was not liquid in the crisis. There was a difficult year. The neighbours came to console the Yoo family on their misfortune.

The grandson, stripped of his appointment, returned to the family’s home district with what he had: his education, his knowledge of official administrative practice, his connections — now diminished but not erased — with other officials in various stages of their own careers. His grandfather, by now in the last year of his life, told him: the fall has given you something you did not have before. You now know what it costs to lose position that was built on someone else’s standing. You will build differently, if you build again.

What the grandson had gained, invisible to his neighbours who were consoling him, was a specific knowledge: the knowledge of how Joseon’s official network actually functioned from the inside, what the informal mechanisms were, which relationships were genuinely reliable and which were maintained only while they were useful. This knowledge was not available to someone who had never held official position; it was equally not available to someone who had held position without experiencing its loss. The fall had educated him in ways the rise had not.

Beat III — Saeong-Jima and the Philosophy of Provisional Fortune

The saeong-jima principle that the Yoo family story embodies is not a counsel of fatalism — not an argument that human effort is irrelevant because fortune will do what it does regardless. It is a counsel of epistemic humility: the recognition that the consequences of any event — success or failure, gain or loss — extend beyond what can be seen at the time of the event, and that the evaluation of an event as fortunate or unfortunate is always preliminary and sometimes reversed by subsequent developments.

This principle has a practical implication for how one should respond to fortune’s turning. The person who responds to good fortune with excessive elation has formed a strong attachment to a state that is not permanent — and the subsequent reversal, when it comes, will be experienced as worse than it would have been had the attachment not formed. The person who responds to bad fortune with excessive despair has similarly formed a strong attachment to having things otherwise — an attachment that prevents them from extracting the specific value the bad fortune may contain.

The old man at the border who responded to each turn with “perhaps” was not emotionally flat; he was not indifferent to what happened to him and his family. He was demonstrating the specific equanimity that comes from understanding fortune’s cyclic nature: the ability to inhabit each moment without overinvesting in its permanence, to extract what each situation genuinely offers rather than being paralysed by grief at what it has taken or deluded by joy at what it has provided.

The Yoo family’s story extends this to three generations because the principle becomes fully visible only across generations. Within a single life, the turns may not be enough — a person can die in a period of either good or bad fortune, never seeing the reversal that would have illustrated the pattern. Across three generations, the pattern becomes legible: each apparent misfortune contained a seed of subsequent advantage, each apparent fortune contained a seed of subsequent vulnerability. The family that understands this is the family that knows how to navigate both.

Beat IV — The Grandson’s Second Career

The grandson, with his grandfather’s words and his own experience of official life’s inside mechanisms, eventually rebuilt. He did not attempt to restore the exact position he had lost — he understood now that the position had been built on someone else’s standing, and that building again on the same foundation would expose him to the same vulnerability. He built instead on his own accumulated knowledge: the administrative practice he had learned in office, the genuine (as opposed to merely useful) relationships he had maintained, and the specific understanding of how to assess which opportunities were grounded in something durable and which were attractive precisely because they were built on the same unstable foundations that had collapsed before.

His second career was less spectacular than his first. He did not achieve the heights the examination results had once seemed to promise. He achieved something more durable: a modest but stable position in which his actual capacities — educated, practically experienced, possessing the specific knowledge that comes only from having been inside the system and having seen it from multiple angles — were genuinely valued and reliably used. He grew old in this position, and when his own children came of age, he told them the grandfather’s story and the story of his own rise and fall, as a single teaching about the provisional nature of all apparent fortune.

“The Yoo family’s grandfather said ‘perhaps’ to everything. He was wrong about nothing.” — Korean village commentary on the tale

The fortunes of Yoo have been remembered in Korean oral tradition because they demonstrate, across the arc of three generations, that the old man at the border was not merely being philosophically interesting when he responded to each turn with “perhaps.” He was being practically accurate. The horse that ran away did return with another horse; the broken leg did prevent conscription; the position gained did create the specific vulnerability that the position’s loss eventually educated the grandson beyond. The “perhaps” is not detachment from caring about outcomes. It is the humility to admit that outcomes extend further than the moment of their arrival, and that wisdom consists in holding each one lightly enough to extract what it genuinely offers rather than what you wanted it to be.

Frequently Asked Questions